And Now Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Jan. 6th 2007
8am

* Note for the Following Article all Citations will be numbered (#) and footnoted as a downloadable file at the end of the piece if there are any questions about these sources due email me at the following address Reaganite88@gmail.com. If more then one citation has the same # that indicates they were pulled from the same source.*

"I accept this gavel in the spirit of partnership, not partisanship, and I look forward to working with you, Mr. Boehner, and the Republicans in the Congress for the good of the American people." - Nancy Pelosi (1.)

Well somebody hand me a shovel, I am knee deep in bull. I find this quote interesting considering that Nancy Pelosi is one of the single most partisan members of the house, past and present. The following entry is going to be dedicated to pointing out the nonsense this woman has pushed in her tenure as a congresswoman. Let's start off with her anti-republican corruption talking points. I suggest you get some sort of seat cushion this is going to be a long journey.

"Americans will no longer tolerate the Republicans' continued abuses of power and catering to corporate special interests,"- Nancy Pelosi (2.)

Really? Well maybe you should rephrase that to include your abuse and your catering to special interest. For instance let us take a look at Nancy Pelosi's Campaign Finance Report, because the "Drive by media" (3.) isn't going to. Mrs. Pelosi in the recent election took a whopping $1,095,775 that's 60.2% of her total campaign fund from PACs, or Political Action Committees (Special Interest).  Guess what else, of that $1,095,775, $615,700 came from businesses. (4.) Wow it's so good to know that Corporate Special interest are officially out of Congress.

Post War Iraq Comments

"The president led us into the Iraq war on the basis of unproven assertions without evidence; he embraced a radical doctrine of pre-emptive war unprecedented in our history; and he failed to build a true international coalition." - Nancy Pelosi (2.)                 

So how "Unproven" was the threat of Iraq well how about we go back to Pre War discussion and ask Nancy herself.

Pre War Iraq Comments

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Nancy Pelosi (2.)

Why is something a threat but when a republican confronts that threat, suddenly it is like Saddam was a nothing but a snuggly bunny? If Speaker Pelosi wants to know why we went to war she should look no further then her own comments. That and of course the indictment of Osama bin Laden that citied Iraq as a threat and stated that

"Al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq."  Indictment of Osama Bin Laden (5.)

and who published that indictment... Oh yeah President Clinton. Even better is the Speaker saying we needed an international coalition to go to war in Iraq. Well considering when in 1991 we had the full support of the U.N. to go to war with Iraq, Speaker Pelosi voted against the gulf war resolution (6.)  I find that really hard to conceive. But why be honest about your comments and those of your political party when you can just blame President Bush. President Bush who Pelosi refers to as "mentally unstable" (7.), Cleary that is a statement of respect and bipartisanship. I would like to say that concludes the amount of bull slung by our incoming speaker but I would be lying.

Nancy on the Framers

"The genius of our founders was that every two years new members would bring to this House their spirit of renewal and hope for the American people." - Nancy Pelosi (1.)

Wow suddenly Nancy Pelosi is paying tribute to the Founders. I find this amusing considering absolutely nothing she preaches shows any understanding of the Founders. The speaker is a typical liberal who's pride is regulating and punishing successful business, which is kind of at odds with the Founding Father's who subscribed to the concept of "Laissez Faire Economics" (8.). Also I am not so sure founding fathers would have been too keen on partial birth abortion,

Fetuses aborted at this stage are dispatched by cracking of the head and removing of the brains via vacuum cleaner, clearly reflecting a woman's right to choose (9.) Check source for complete diagram of procedure,

which the speaker has voted against banning twice(6.). Though Nancy's quote makes sense I am thoroughly aggravated that she has decided to acknowledge founders existed but ignore everything they stood for. Madam Speaker's view of the government in no way parallels to that of our founder. But as per usual the liberals ignore the founders until their "genius" reflects their own self interest.

It would be nice to think that America can look forward to two years of cooperation peace and understanding, but the sad fact is the storm that is brewing in the democratic caucus is just starting. Speaker Pelosi has already lampooned the President before his upcoming Iraq proposal saying frankly,

"If the president wants to add to this mission, he's going to have to justify it,"-Nancy Pelosi (10.)

Justify it? Justify nothing madam speaker the man is the president of the United States and the Commander and Chief of the United States Military, he dose not have to explain any military decisions to congress under the constitution. I am really sick and tired of listening to a woman who voted against the war in Iraq giving suggestions on how to "win" that war (6.). The fact is she dose not care about victory she only wants a quick solution that ignores everyone involved from the troops, and general's, to the pentagon. The good news is once the America people get a load of there "plans" Pelosi and crew will be put where they belong, on the ash heap of history never to be heard from again.

Case Closed
December 30, 2006
1:55am

Saddam Hussein was hung yesterday in the first fair trial to happen with in the borders of Iraq in a very long time. This is truly a landmark event in the history of the fledging democracy. Iraq's provisional government granted the ruthless dictator something that was never given to his victims, due process. Despite the skepticism that has surrounded the Saddam trial there is little doubt that the former leader of Iraq received a fair and well run trial.

This is proof that despite its many shortcomings Iraq is not nearly as uncivilized as some may think. They are not a nation of savages completely unable to accept or live with democracy. They had a chance to beat Saddam to death and drag him trough the streets as the Italians did to Mussolini, but instead they opted to act in a civilized manor. The Iraqi government gave the ruthless dictator, responsible for numerous acts of genocide, his day in court. They sat trough his triads, his Koran readings, and his poor court attendance and even allowed him to appeal his death sentence.

In the end justice was served and the people of Iraq can rest safe knowing the terror felt under the reign of Saddam will never return. Furthermore this is proof that peace and prosperity as well as democracy can be brought to Iraq. This trial showed that the Iraqis understand due process and other concepts many liberals assume they could never handle. Liberals who by the way were clamoring that he not be killed on moral grounds. The only thing that can and most probably will stop the great transformation we see taking place in Iraq is the ADD of the American Public.

Do not misunderstand what I am saying. Not only do I respect the former Presidents opinion, but I have no problem with him making those comments. However, is it necessary to discuss a two year old interview within 24 hours of President Ford’s passing. Not only was the article run on the Washington Post's website, it was the as of Dec. 28^th 12:18 and the boldest headline on the home page.

Why do we continually forget the most important part of the after death remembrances is to remember the guy who died? President Ford was a tremendous man who helped rebuild the office of the President after the destruction of the Watergate affair. It would remain prestigious until a certain philander from Arkansas was elected and shortly after the office’s reputation, as well as its carpets were in need of a deep cleansing. That aside we should be honoring this great man who truly embodied the concept of integrity and served a long and distinguished career in public service.

Woodward should have the sense to let the funeral and other ceremonies take place before running this article, at which time it would be more appropriate, but instead he has to jump at the first chance to use a former Presidents passing as an opportunity to take pot shots at our sitting president. Well let’s hope this nonsense ends here, because if I have to sit through another funeral turned Bush Roast I am going to be sick.

Sources Used:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/27/AR2006122701558.html

If You Give Iran A Cookie….
Dec 25, 2006 
11:00pm

           Go figure the UN is leveling non military sanctions against Iran. Well it’s about time they did something. The world is currently faced with its gravest threat to peace and prosperity since rise of Hitler in the 1930’s and the UN has just finally begun to realize what is going on. Yet there is still a very scary round of appeasements on the table or as the modern day politicos like to call them “economic incentives”.  Why do we continually offer these psychos a gift bag to stop developing a massive weapon that could potentially destroy an entire American City? This is a pathetic attempt to appease a con artist dictator who stood at the UN mere months ago and referred to the sitting United States President as Satan, maybe I am off base but I think those are fighting words as the old saying goes.

            To understand the stupidity of this proposed deal with Iran that western nations have offered it is important to go back to the grand Clinton-North Korea non proliferation deal of the early 1990’s. Along with the help of Jimmy Carter, who not only screwed up the country as president but also likes to do it as an ex-president, Bill Clinton put together the “Framework Agreement” that sent North Korea two light water reactors (specific ones requested by North Korea) as well as tons of fuel and grain each year for a simple promise to not go after weapons. Now can you guess what they did with the two nuclear reactors and massive economic aid … OH that’s right they built massive bombs, one of which they tested on the fourth of July of this year.

Yet of course who was blamed for the North Koreans possessing nuclear arms that’s right President Bush. The president so far this year has been blamed for everything even the racist rant by Kramer (Michael Richards) of Seinfeld who during his apology mentioned the tensions caused by the strain of the failures of Hurricane Katrina (spare me).

            This is a time of grave danger and conflict where we as a nation should be standing united behind our president instead we treat him like a common side show act. He may not be the greatest leader but the man we saw on 9/11, who delivered the battle cry on the ashes of the twin towers, still lives within our battered Commander in Chief and he seems to be lone voice still talking of U.S. Victory in Iraq. His defiance with regards to the ruthless nutjob Iranian president is something to be admired not criticized. Because when it comes to idea of giving Iran some “economic incentives” I like to apply an old proverb straight from a children’s book “If you give a Mouse(Iran) a Cookie… they're going to want some milk”.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Head Democratic National Committee
December 3, 2006
4:00pm

             It appears the Iranian President will be the new head of the DNC; well maybe not, but if you got a chance to read his recent letter to President Bush you might think so. In his letter, President Ahmadinejad, aside from once again refusing to acknowledge the holocaust, basically outlined the Democrat talking points from the 06 midterm elections (His version was slightly better organized then the Democrat's was).

"Would it not be more beneficial to bring the U.S. officers and soldiers home and to spend the astronomical U.S. military expenditures in Iraq for the welfare and prosperity of the American people?"- President Ahmadinejad

Sounds familiar doesn’t it; frankly it’s quite scary to hear an enemy of the United States spewing out the talking points of an American political party. The fact is it’s beyond scary. This is not just a conflict or a “situation” as speaker Pelosi likes to refer to it; this is WAR! We as a country are at a crossroad where we must decide to fight or wither in the face of danger. Sad to say that if we choose the latter we are looking at the possibility of relinquishing the sovereignty and freedom we deem so sacred.

The preemptive strike on Iraq shows crackpots like Ahmadinejad that the United States of America will fight to defend itself if it feels threatened. Why else would a foreign leader be preaching to the American people about the evil nature of the acts of the United States, while also praising the political party that ran on the end of the Iraq War?

He wants the democrats to follow trough because the sooner we leave Iraq the sooner his goon squad Hezbollah can come in and destroy all that our brave young men and women have fought to achieve. Hezbollah, yes that’s right you heard me Hezbollah.

As reported by abc news, not only is the Iranian government providing weapons to the Iraq insurgency; but it is also sending Hezbollah in to train the insurgents. Yet if the leaks coming out of the Baker Commission are true it appears we may soon be asking Iran and Syria for help to stabilize Iraq. That’s right the Baked, oh I am sorry Baker, Commission seems to think the best way to win a war is to ask the enemy for help. Well I for one am of the mindset that the path to victory in Iraq and the war on terror has but one road; complete annihilation of the enemy. That’s right actually go after the enemy...and for you liberals, the enemy is in Iraq not in the White House.

Sources Used:

Here are the sources used to write the latest entry for sources from previous entries fell free to contact me at Reaganite88@gmail.com.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-11-29-iran-letter_x.htm

http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=2688501

Culture of Corruption
November 23, 2006
11:41am

As many of you know one of the big issues that swept democrats into power in this year’s election was the presumed corruption of the Republican Party. Of course only the evil Republicans have corruption in their ranks. As per usual the left has managed to portray the Republican Party as the symbol of corruption, and greed; while making themselves out to be the pillars of trust, honor, and integrity. Well let’s take a look at the some of the examples of this “integrity”.

1. Former Rep. Gerry Studs: Admitted to actually having a sexual relationship with a Congressional Paige, to which the democrats responded by awarding him a committee chairmanship. Yet when Florida Rep. Mark Foley is accused of illicit comments towards a Paige and resigns; the left expects the Speaker of the house Dennis Hastert to step down for simply sharing the same political party with Foley.
2. Rep. John Murtha: Murtha was offered a bribe as part of a sting operation. Murtha was offered 50,000 to which he responded “I am not interested at this point but maybe if we do business for awhile”.  Murtha later testified against other congressmen who were part of the scandal and was praised for his efforts.
3. Rep Alcee Hastings: One of only 10 Federal Justices to face impeachment. He was removed as a judge after attempting to shake down defendants for money. Yet despite this he was elected to the house in 1992, and is in line for the Chairmanship of House Intelligence Committee.
4. Rep. Barney Franks: Voted against an act that would prevent people from protesting the funerals of United States Soldiers.
5. Senator “Dirty” Harry Reid: After constantly attacking the Republicans for their involvement with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, it was discovered he took upwards of 60000 from the Indian casinos represented by Jack Abramoff.
6. Senator Robert Byrd: Senator Byrd the Imperial Wizard of the Senate,(Byrd was a former Kegel for the Klu Klux Clan) who made his mark filibustering the civil rights bill of 64, will in January become the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. So let me get this straight Senator Trent Lott compliments former Senator Strum Thurmond at his birthday party and he must resign as majority leader, but this guy can stop civil rights legislation and have at one time been a Klan Kegel and he gets promoted.
7. William Jefferson: As a result of a search in connection with bribery charges was found with over $90000 in his Freezer. He is currently running in a run off election to return, I repeat, return to congress.
8. Senator Elect Jim Webb: Accused of as a youth firing a fake gun at African Americans while shouting racial slurs. He also wrote numerous novels that involve scenes of child pornography and he won his race. But keep in mind George Allen did say “Mucaca” so clearly he is worse.
9. Ted Kennedy: I will not dignify this section with a comment.
10. Bill Clinton: Read Above.

Keep in mind these are just the well known examples. The fact is that corruption is and always will be a part of our system. Over the years both parties have dealt in corruption yet there is one clear and distinct difference, when a Republican screws up he resigns. Mark Foley, Tom Delay, Trent Lott, etc all resigned in face of corruption. So the lesson is if you are corrupt and a Republican switch parties and you might just get a promotion.